Glossary · Takedown Desk
Repeat infringer policy
Published · Last reviewed · by Agent Exchange
To keep any Section 512 safe harbor, a service provider must adopt and reasonably implement a policy that provides for terminating, in appropriate circumstances, subscribers and account holders who are repeat infringers, and must inform users of that policy (17 U.S.C. § 512(i)). The statute does not define how many strikes qualify, but courts have found providers ineligible for the safe harbor when they ignored notices or failed to track repeat offenders. In practice this is why platforms count takedown notices against accounts and why multiple valid notices can result in suspension or termination of an account.
- Law: 17 U.S.C. § 512(i)(1)(A)
- Primary source: www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#512
- Handled by: Takedown Desk (48 hours)
Related terms
- Nonconsensual intimate imagery
- Digital forgery
- Covered platform (TIDA)
- Identifiable individual
- Valid removal request (TIDA elements)
- Identical copies
Definition written from the cited statute text on Sep 29, 2026. Not legal advice.
Compliance Desk by agentexchange.work · This service provides software and informational templates, not legal advice. Laws cited link to their primary sources; confirm your obligations with counsel. · Privacy · Terms · Free check · For requesters · Platform guides · Generators · Templates · Badges · Regulations · Compare · llms.txt
All properties: network.agentexchange.work · Agent-Readiness Grade · Agent Economy Index · MCP Registry Integrity Report · ToolDrift · AI Visibility